..

pg_repack

principle

pg_repack 1.5.0 – Reorganize tables in PostgreSQL databases with minimal locks

https://github.com/reorg/pg_repack

  1. create a log table to record changes made to the original table
  2. add a trigger onto the original table, logging INSERTs, UPDATEs and DELETEs into our log table
  3. create a new table containing all the rows in the old table
  4. build indexes on this new table
  5. apply all changes which have accrued in the log table to the new table
  6. swap the tables, including indexes and toast tables, using the system catalogs
  7. drop the original table

The basic idea is

  1. transport the existent data with a old snapshot
  2. record the incremental data into a table and replay the record

And this idea is so general that almost all online-ddl ability in PG(supported in extensions) takes the way.

details

Although the idea is so simple, there are many problems to challenge. Such as how to ensure there are no duplicated or lost data in both existent part and incremental part. So code-level details are shown below:

All the 7 step are manipulated through 2 connections: See function repack_one_table for detail:

  1. create a log table to record changes made to the original table

  2. add a trigger onto the original table, logging INSERTs, UPDATEs and DELETEs into our log table

    1. conn1 starts a transaction and acquire an advisory lock to prevent potential conflict with other repack process
    2. get the AccessiveExclusive lock to the original table, tbl for example
    3. create the trigger on tbl and the corresponding log-table where the incremental changes will be stored.
    4. (Just comments: If we release the exclusive lock here, we may not able to acquire a shared lock later if another process has gotten a exclusive lock in the interval, which can cause that we have no way to continue or revert what we have done. So we must acquire a lock during the whole process. 👌)
    5. conn2 tries to acquire the AccessiveShared lock on tbl. Since the conn1 ’s transaction hasn’t finished, this lock acquisition will be blocked.
    6. conn1 kill all connections that tries to perform a DDL operation, whose character is waiting for AccessiveLock . Then, conn1 commits.
    7. Now conn2 get the AccessiveShared lock on tbl , which can ensure that no other dll operation on tbl ✌️

  3. create a new table containing all the rows in the old table

    1. conn1 begins a serializable transaction( repeatable read, at least)

    2. conn1 get the vxids of current active transactions

    3. conn1 delete all data in tbl with the current snapshot (This means we don’t perform a “truncate” operation ). This is a very skillful technique:

      1. The table shows the secret:

        tbl log table
        visible existent data empty
        invisible incremental data incremental data

      2. All existent data is visible in tbl through the current snapshot

      3. All incremental data is invisible in log table and tbl (The latter one isn’t important

      4. So there is no lost or duplicated data

    4. conn1 copies all data in tbl to a temp table tbl-tmp for example

    5. conn1 commits

  4. build indexes on this new table. (I don’t care this.)

  5. apply all changes which have accrued in the log table to the new table

    1. conn1 apply at most 1000 records in log-table , until
      1. the remaining records are few. AND
      2. All transactions in vxids finish. This operation is to keep the ISOLATION, but it still has some accidence. #TODO
    2. (Just comments: Now we believe that there is few records in log-table .)
    3. conn2 acquire the AccessiveExclusive lock. Note that no other process can do that
    4. conn2 apply all data in log-table

  6. swap the tables, including indexes and toast tables, using the system catalogs

    1. conn2 swaps relfilenode between tbl-tmp and tbl
    2. conn2 commits

  7. drop the original table

    1. conn1 drop the current tbl-tmp
    2. conn1 analyze the current tbl
    3. conn1 release the advisory lock

written by mobilephone724